What is
Feminism?
•
O.E.D:
‘The advocacy of women’s rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes.’
•
‘The
issue of rights for women first became prominent during the French and American
revolutions in the late 18th century. In Britain it was not until the emergence
of the suffragette movement in the late 19th century that there was significant
political change. A ‘second wave’ of feminism arose in the 1960s, with an
emphasis on unity and sisterhood; seminal figures included Betty Friedan and
Germaine Greer.’
•
Tate
Glossary: Feminist Art
•
‘May
be defined as art by women artists made consciously in the light of
developments in feminist art theory since about 1970.’
Historical
Context
•
First
wave feminism:
19th and 20th
Century
1759- Mary
Wollstonecraft
‘Vindication
of the Rights of Women’
The
‘suffragettes’- 1903 The Women’s Social and Political Union (WSPU) founded by
the Pankhurst family.
1918- women
over the age of 30 given the vote.
1928- women
win the vote on equal terms with men.
First woman
allowed entry to Oxford University- 1920
•
Second
wave feminism:
Late 20th Century
(1960s-1980s)
•
Third
wave feminism:1980s- today?
Feminist
Art History and Theory:
•
Feminist analysis suggests that the art system
and art history have institutionalised sexism, just as with society at large.
•
Indeed
the very notion of ‘the artist’ and ‘art history’ (i.e. his-story) can
be viewed as an entirely masculine construct.
•
Feminist theory, therefore, argues that women
artists have been ignored, and effectively ‘written out’ of art history.
•
Feminist analysis argues for a total
re-evaluation and reinterpretation of art history.
•
The feminist critic seeks to both increase the
visibility of women artists in art history and contemporary practise, as well
as criticising the sexist nature of society and culture.
We are then
dealing with ‘Feminisms’ as there are a range of different view points,
theoretical perspectives and practices which fall under the concept of
‘feminism’ or ‘feminist theory’:
Linda
Nochlin – writes a famous essay titled: ‘Why Have There Been No Great Women
Artists? (ARTnews January 1971)’
•
‘The
most signal omission of feminist art history to date is our failure to analyse why
modern art history ignores the existence of women artists. Why it has become silent
about them, why it has consistently dismissed as insignificant those it did
acknowledge.’
•
‘To
confront these questions enables us to identify the unacknowledged ideology
which informs the practice of this discipline and the values which decide its
classification and interpretation in all of art.’
-Griselda Pollock, Old
Mistresses: Women, Art and Ideology,
1981, p.49
‘What is feminist art? There is no such entity; no
homogenous movement defined by a characteristic style, favoured media or
typical subject- matter. There are instead feminist art practices which cannot
be comprehended by the standard procedures and protocols of modernist art
history and criticism which depend upon isolating aesthetic considerations such
as style or media.’
-Griselda Pollock, ‘Feminism and
Modernism’ in Parker, R. and Pollock, G. Framing Feminism: Art and the
Woman’s Movement, 1970-85, (London: Pandora Press, 1987)
Challenging
traditions of representation and ‘the gaze’:
•
‘Men
look at women. Women watch themselves being looked at. This determines not only
most relations between men and women but also the relation of men to
themselves.’
John Berger, Ways of
Seeing, 1972
•
‘We
need to track the ‘tradition of western erotic art and the nude (man the maker
and spectator, woman the passive object of desire).’’
-Lisa Tickner, ‘The Body
Politics: Female sexuality
and
women artists since 1970’, 1978
Who is
looking?
•
‘Whose
body and whose sexuality have images of the female body traditionally encoded?’
•
‘What
rules and conventions govern the visual representation of the sexual body that,
during the nineteenth century, came increasingly and exclusively (in terms of
both art and popular media) to be primarily the female nude?’
•
‘Who
is looking?’
•
‘Who
is and is not allowed to look and thus to know the body of the sexualised other
or, as importantly in the case of woman, the sexualised self?’
– Questions
posed by feminist art historian Griselda Pollock in her essay
‘Nude
bodies: Displacing the Boundaries between Art and Pornography’ in
Sweeney and
Hodder eds., The Body, 2002
‘I’d like to make a distinction between “feminist
practice” and the “feminist problematic” in art (problematic in the sense that
a concept cannot be isolated from the general theoretical or ideological framework
in which it is used). One aspect of the problematic is that it points out the
absence of a notion of practice in the way the question is currently phrased
and most familiarly posed- ‘What is feminist art?’’
Mary Kelly, ‘Art and Sexual Politics’, 1977 in Kelly, M. Imaging
Desire, (London: MIT Press, 1996)
Mary Kelly, Post Partum Document, 1973-79.
’Post-Partum
Document is a six-year exploration of the mother-child relationship.’ Mary
Kelly
• The work was originally shown at the
ICA London
• It caused controversy due to the
inclusion of dirty nappy liners.
‘Each of
the six-part series concentrates on a formative moment in her son’s mastery of
language and her own sense of loss, moving between the voices of the mother,
child and analytic observer.’
INSTITUTIONAL AND POLITICAL CRITIQUE :
Judy Chicago and Miriam Schapiro,
Womanhouse, (Los Angeles, 1972)
California Feminist Woman’s Art
Programme (Cal Arts)
Kathy
Huberland, Bridal Staircase, 1972
Mierle
Laderman Ukeles, ‘I make maintenance art one hour
every day’, 1976
The Guerrilla
Girls
• Formed in New York in 1980.
• The group aim to expose
discrimination in the art world.
• They conceal their identity by using
gorilla masks and pseudonyms using the names of deceased women artists- Frida
Kahlo, Georgia O’Keefe etc.
Defining
‘Post Feminism’:
•
The
debate around what feminism is now continues the sense that we are not dealing
with one perspective but many.
•
Post
feminism represents a shift in feminist theory from 1968 onwards, which is
interested in what feminism is/means today.
•
It
is a pluralistic viewpoint / political position that argues feminism has
achieved a deconstruction of patriarchal discourse.
•
It
is also a reaction to second wave feminism.
•
It
is a label used to describe some critical perspectives that may argue feminism
has succeeded in its struggle.
•
Alternatively
third wave feminism can be seen to focus on diversity and identity in global
society. It focuses on the multicultural nature of society and considers the
role of feminism in challenging dominant ideologies for all who are not
represented by them.
WACK ! Art
and the Feminist Revolution
•
The
Museum of Modern Art Los Angeles (MoCA), March 4th- July 16th
2007
•
Rationale:
‘The first comprehensive, historical exhibition to examine the international
foundations and legacy of feminist art, WACK! Art and the Feminist
Revolution focuses on the crucial period 1965-80, during which the majority
of feminist activism and artmaking occurred internationally.’
Critical
Reception of WACK!:
•
Survey
of feminist art - Timeframe 1965-1880
•
Too
broad? 119 artists, 21 countries
•
How
does it frame feminism? Art movement or set of practices responding to emerging
feminist critique of 1970s?
•
Cover
of the catalogue becomes an issues of debate. Original artwork: Martha Rosler, Body
Beautiful, of Beauty Knows No Pain: Hot House or Harem, 1966-1972 – was
intended as a critique of representation.
•
What
means are being communicated in its recontextualisation on the cover of the
catalogue?
Conclusion
•
Feminism
is a response to society and culture.
•
It
aims to highlight gender as a social construct and to illuminate the
discriminatory practices that have historically shaped the role of women in
society.
•
In
a theoretical sense it is a set of ideas and perspectives about how we might
understand and destabilise dominant ideologies in society and art history.
•
In
terms of art practice we can map a series of methodologies, approaches and
practices that respond to the emerging feminist critique of the 1970s.
•
Feminist
art history offers us a way forward in understanding the meanings and
ideologies that underpin the art world, the writings of the histories of art,
and art practices that seek to challenge them.
Differencing the Canon:
‘In the work by artists we name women, we should not read
for signs of a known femininity- womanhood, women like us…..- but for signs of
femininity’s structurally conditioned and dissonant struggle with the already
existing, historically specific definitions and changing dispositions of the
terms Man and Woman within sexual difference…..
We can read
for inscriptions of the feminine – which do not come from a fixed
origin, this female painter, that women artist, but from those working in the
predicament of femininity in phallocentric culture in their diverse formations
and varying systems of representation.’
Griselda
Pollock, Differencing the Canon: Feminist Desire and the Writing of Art's
Histories, (London: Routledge, 1999.)
No comments:
Post a Comment