Wednesday, 14 March 2012

Space, Place and Body


 Lecture Topics
       Architecture and the body
       Definitions and theoretical approaches to concepts of space and place
       How the themes have been taken up in artistic practice from 1960s onwards
       How the themes have been taken up in curatorial practice and contemporary art exhibitions

The Homely vs the ‘Unhomely’

Homely

       House
       Home
       Domestic
       Family and childhood
       Sanctuary
       Memory
       Nostalgia
       Experience
       Lived space

Unhomely

       (The Unheimlich or the The Uncanny- Freud)
       The haunted house
       Surreal
       Subversive
       Psychic
       Fragmented
       Distorted
       Nightmare

Why- Space, Place and Body?
       Traditionally our understanding of the built environment/architecture is intrinsically linked to design, form and structure.
       Simply put architecture is ‘the complex or carefully designed structure of something’ OED.
       There is, however, a history of architectural theory and practice that is keen to draw attention to the actual ‘lived experience’ of this space.
       For example, how we inhabit it, what it means to us, and how our experience of the world/ built environment we live in informs our lives.

Structure + Form + Body
       Modernist architect Le Corbusier defined architecture as : “the precise and monumental interplay of form within light.”
       It is here, however, where the formal structures of the built environment and the qualities of the world, which we live in and experience, collide.
       In this relationship we might also add the other key element of architecture: the inhabitant – us – who experience it through our bodies.

Place:
       ‘Noun 1. a particular position, point, or area in space; a location’
Space:
       ‘Noun 1. continuous area or expanse which is free, available, or unoccupied:
       2. the dimensions of height, depth, and width within which all things exist and move:
       3. an interval of time’

Theory and Philosophy: Space and Place
       Michel Foucault: Relational Space/ Social Space
            ‘The space in which we live, which draws us out of ourselves, in which the erosion of our lives, our time and our history occurs, the space that claws and gnaws at us, is also, in itself, a heterogeneous space. In other words, we do not live in a kind of void, inside of which we could place individuals and things. We do not live inside a void that could be colored with diverse shades of light, we live inside a set of relations that delineates sites which are irreducible to one another and absolutely not superimposable on one another.’
                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                        Michel Foucault, ‘Of Other Spaces’ (1967), Heterotopias.
       Gaston Bachelard: Relationship between space and time

            ‘In its countless alveoli space contains compressed time. This is what space is for..’
                       
                                                                        Gaston Bachelard (1994) The Poetics of Space, Massachusetts: Beacon Press, p. 8

How have these concepts been taken up in the visual arts?

What are the critical perspectives and methodologies that we have available to think through them?

Mapping Intersections between Body and Space in Art Practice:
       Minimalism:
            Body, object, space, 1960s
       Gender and Space:
            The feminist critique of gendered space, 1970s
       Postmodernism:
Changing status of space and experience: ‘non-place’, global and collective space, 1980s onwards

Minimalism
Minimalism or ‘Minimal’ Art appeared in America in the 1960s. Artists associated with it include Carl Andre, Dan Flavin, Robert Morris, Eva Hesse, Sol Le Witt, Donald Judd.
It aimed to reduce art to abstract elements, geometric forms and formal solutions.
Artworks often used industrial processes of production and materials such as bricks, fluorescent tubes, metal etc.
Carl Andre, Equivalent VIII, 1966
Andre’s work is part of a series of eight sculptures that use 120 firebricks. Each sculpture is arranged differently but they all have the same height, mass and volume.

The Minimalist Object:
       ‘Half or more of the best new work in the last few years has been neither painting nor sculpture’- Donald Judd, ‘Specific Objects’, Arts Yearbook 8,1965.
       ‘Strong gestalt sensations’ and ‘Unitary Form’- Robert Morris, ‘Notes on Sculpture1-3’, Artforum, February 1966,October 1966, Summer 1967.

       Michael Fried, ‘Art and Objecthood’, Artforum, Spring 1967
            ‘It must somehow confront the beholder — they must, one might say, be placed not just in his space but in his way’.
            ‘The object, not the beholder, must remain the center (sic) or focus of the situation; but the situation itself belongs to the beholder — it is his situation.’ 

‘And so we stare at the pit in the earth and think we both do and don’t know what sculpture is’  - Architectural Sculpture             
Rosalind E. Krauss, Sculpture in the Expanded Field, 1978


       Site Construction
       Creation of ‘Place’
       Land Art
       Interventions in the landscape
       Utopian locations
       Escape

‘Lived’ Space
       Focus on the body’s relationship to space.
       Focus on movement, boundaries and experience.
       Bruce Nauman, Walking in an exaggerated manner round the perimeter of a square, 1967/68


Phenomenology
       Oxford English Dictionary: 1. The science of phenomena as distinct from that of the nature of being.
       2. an approach that concentrates on the study of consciousness and the objects of direct experience.
Phenomenology tells us that we experience the world through our body —we are an extension of it.
It is only by having a body that we experience the world.
It is about perception – we perceive the world with our body through vision and movement.
Philosopher Edward Casey proposes: ‘The places we inhabit are known by the bodies we live.’      


Key Theorist: Maurice Merleau-Ponty,  Phenomenology of Perception, 1945
       ‘As far as bodily space is concerned, it is clear that there is a knowledge of place which is reducible to a sort of co-existence with that place, and which is not simply nothing, even though it cannot be conveyed by a description or even by the mute reference of a gesture.’
            Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception, p.121.
       ‘There would be no space at all for me if I had no body.’

            Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception, p.117.


Robert Morris, The Present Tense of Space, 1978
’In perceiving architectural space, one’s own space is not separate but coexistent with what is perceived….one is surrounded.’


Shepard Fairey, Phenomenology of the City, Manifesto, 1990

‘The OBEY sticker campaign can be explained as an experiment in Phenomenology.
The FIRST AIM OF PHENOMENOLOGY is to reawaken a sense of wonder about one’s environment. The OBEY sticker attempts to stimulate curiosity and bring people to question both the sticker and their relationship with their surroundings.’

Gender and Space: Critical Approaches
It is possible to identify the ‘intricacy and profundity of the connection of space and place with gender and the construction of gender relations.’
Dorreen Massey, Space, Place and Gender, 1994, p.2


Postmodernism: 

Non-places
       ‘If a place can be defined as relational, historical and concerned with identity, then a space which cannot be defined as relational, or historical, or concerned with identity will be a non-place.’ 
       ‘…the real non-places of supermodernity – the ones we inhabit when we are driving down the motorway, wandering through the supermarket or sitting in an airport lounge waiting for the next flight to London or Marseille….’ 


Reclaiming Space and Place?
Mariko Mori, Body Capsule Project, Beginning of the End: Past, Present, Future 1995-2006

Creating Space and Place?
       Relational
       Collective
       Nexus
       Social

Interiority: Psychic Space/ Surreal Space
       We can also map an exploration of the relationship between space, place and the body in the visual arts and cultural theory that is concerned with the spaces of the mind.
       Here an occupation with the individual’s psychic space and an experience of space which may be subversive, surreal, disconcerting or ‘unhomely’, can be registered in Modernist and Postmodernist art practice and architectural design.
       These phenomena and ideas have recently been explored in two key exhibitions:
       Hayward Gallery, Walking in My Mind, 2009
       Barbican Art Gallery, The Surreal House, 2010


Walking in My Mind: Adventure into the Artist’s Imagination, Hayward Gallery, Southbank, 23 June- 6 September, 2009
       Mental and psychic space
       Interiority
       Experience
       Creativity
       Alternate places
       Escape
       Intersections between art and architecture
       Imaginary spaces
       Creative space
       Construction/ Creation of environments and structured space

"I cannot tell you how the Island really is – I have no idea – I can state only the facts as I perceive them. You must be satisfied with this or you must travel there yourself sometime, and see these beings in their natural environment, for the place is utterly subjective."    
                        -Charles Avery, The Islanders- Untitled, Eternity Chamber,2007


The Surreal House, 10th June – 12 September, 2010 Barbican Art Gallery
Curator Jane Alison suggests:
‘First and foremost the surreal house is a mirror of the unconscious, the body as a feeling, even fractured entity. The house can also be thought of as a special kind of object within surrealism— the container object’

       In ‘The Surreal House’ strange events, narratives and surreal objects take over the space of the home.
       They subvert our idea of the home as a sanctuary and safe place.

The Unhomely
The uncanny or unheimlich, according to Freud, ‘is in reality nothing new or alien, but something that is familiar and old-established in the mind and which has become alienated from it only through the process of repression.’

Anthony Vidler suggests that the uncanny or the ‘unhomely’ is ‘embodied in a feeling of alienation as a dichotomy to the security of the home and a feeling of estrangement or homesickness’

No comments:

Post a Comment